Claude Max · Marketing Implementation Plan

Claude as Your
Marketing Department

A complete playbook for building five marketing functions — content, design direction, research, thought leadership, and campaign planning — using Claude. Built for one founder and one intern.

5
Marketing functions
2
People to run it
~10×
Output vs. manual
Week 1
First results
PRE

Before You Begin

One-time setup that makes every workflow 10× better. Do this first.

1. Account Setup
1

Use Claude Max

Claude Max gives you access to Research mode (for deep competitive intelligence), higher usage limits, and Claude Projects. All five workflows in this plan require at minimum Claude Pro. Max is needed for Research mode.

2

Create a Claude Project

Go to Claude.ai → Projects → New Project. Name it "[Your Firm] Marketing". This project will hold all your brand files and persist context across every conversation — you never re-explain your business.

3

Install Claude Code (for Skills)

Claude Code is the CLI that unlocks slash-command skills like /copywriting, /content-strategy, /competitor-alternatives, and others referenced in this plan. Install via: npm install -g @anthropic-ai/claude-code

2. Build Your Brand Block (Most Important Step)

This is a single text file you upload to your Claude Project. Every prompt you ever run inherits it. Build it once, update it quarterly. This is what separates generic AI output from output that actually sounds like your firm.

Brand Block Template — Upload to Claude Project Knowledge
FIRM PROFILE
Name: [Your CA Firm Name]
Type: Chartered Accountancy Consultancy
Location: [City], India
Founded: [Year]
Team size: [Number]
Services: [e.g., Tax filing, GST compliance, Audit, Startup compliance, Financial advisory]
Specialisation: [e.g., Startups / SMEs / HNI Individuals / D2C brands]

IDEAL CLIENT
Primary: [e.g., Founders of 5-50 person startups in Bangalore who have recently raised funding and need compliance support]
Secondary: [e.g., SME owners with ₹2-20Cr revenue who are stressed about GST audits]
What they fear: [e.g., FEMA penalties, missed TDS deadlines, GST notices, audit complications]
What they want: [e.g., Peace of mind, tax savings, a CA who proactively communicates]
Language they use: [e.g., "my books are a mess", "I don't understand this notice", "how much can I save"]

POSITIONING
Differentiator: [e.g., We're the CA firm that explains everything in plain language and never leaves clients chasing us]
Tagline: [if you have one]
What we are not: [e.g., Not a factory firm that treats you as ticket #47]

BRAND VOICE
Tone: [e.g., Clear, direct, warm, never condescending]
Personality: [e.g., The CA friend who tells you the truth without jargon]
Always say: [phrases you naturally use]
Never say: [jargon, buzzwords, phrases that sound like every other CA firm]
Writing style: [short sentences / plain English / data-backed / story-driven]

COMPETITORS
[List 3-5 CA firms or types — e.g., Big4 firms, boutique tax firms, online CA platforms like Clear or Taxmann]

SEASONAL CALENDAR
Key revenue periods: March (ITR), July (filing deadline), October (advance tax), January-February (audit season)
Key content moments: Union Budget (Feb), GST Council meetings, SEBI/MCA circulars

Save this as brand-block.md and upload to Project Knowledge. Every new chat in this project will have access to it automatically.

3. Split Responsibilities
Role Claude Founder Intern
Research Synthesizes, structures, produces briefs Defines the question + reviews findings Gathers raw sources, runs prompts, formats output
Content Drafts, repurposes, reformats Provides raw input (voice note, opinion, experience) Runs prompts, edits, publishes
Design Writes Canva brief with full specs Approves visual direction Executes in Canva against the brief
Long-Form Structures, drafts, maintains voice 20-min voice note or brain dump Runs prompts, does human enrichment pass
Campaign Builds full brief, messaging, channel plan Approves brief, provides offer/positioning input Executes copy and scheduling

01

Research Department

The function most CA firms skip entirely because it takes too long. Claude cuts a 2-day research project to 2 hours.

Replaces: Market analyst + Competitive intelligence analyst
Why this comes first: Every other department — content, design, campaign — depends on research. What are competitors saying? What language do clients use? What content gaps exist? Without answers to these, everything else is guesswork. Build your research foundation in Week 1.
Tool Stack for Research

The best research workflow combines two tools in sequence. Do not use only one.

Tool What it does best When to use it
Perplexity (free) Gathers real-time facts, citations, competitive data from the web in under 3 minutes First pass — gather raw intelligence
Claude Research mode Deep synthesis, weighing contradictory evidence, structured long-form reports Second pass — synthesize and apply to your context
Claude (standard) Apply findings to your specific situation, generate battlecards, write briefs Final pass — turn research into usable output

The master sequence: Perplexity → gather facts → paste into Claude → synthesize → paste into Claude Project → apply to your context and generate deliverable.

Workflow 1 — Competitor CA Firm Analysis

Run this once per quarter. Understand exactly what other CA firms in your market are saying, where they're weak, and where the positioning gap is.

1

Gather raw data on each competitor

For each CA firm you want to analyze: copy their homepage copy, their services page, their LinkedIn about section, and paste 10-15 Google/Justdial reviews into a text doc. Also copy 5 of their recent LinkedIn posts if they have them.

2

Run the per-competitor analysis prompt (below)

Paste everything you gathered into Claude with the prompt. Do this separately for each competitor — one analysis per firm.

3

Run the cross-competitor synthesis prompt (below)

After analyzing 3+ competitors, paste all findings together and run the synthesis prompt. This reveals the positioning whitespace — what no one is saying that you could own.

Prompt 1A — Per-Competitor Analysis
You are a competitive intelligence analyst. Analyze this CA firm based on the content I've pasted below.

Identify:
1) Their primary value proposition — who are they talking to and what's the main promise?
2) Top 3 reasons clients choose them (from reviews and messaging)
3) Top 3 recurring complaints or weaknesses (from negative reviews)
4) What clients say they wish was better
5) Their positioning — who specifically are they targeting?
6) Content and distribution strategy (what do they post, how often, what topics?)
7) Tone of voice — how do they sound? (formal/casual, jargon-heavy/plain English)
8) What type of client they attract vs. what type we want to attract

[PASTE COMPETITOR HOMEPAGE + REVIEWS + LINKEDIN CONTENT HERE]
Prompt 1B — Cross-Competitor Synthesis (run after 3+ individual analyses)
I've analyzed [X] CA firms in our market. Here are my findings for each:

[PASTE INDIVIDUAL ANALYSES HERE]

Now identify:
1) Which positioning territories are most crowded — what are ALL of them saying?
2) Where is there whitespace — what is NO ONE saying that clients actually care about?
3) Which client segments appear underserved across all competitors?
4) What content topics are they all covering vs. what topics are completely absent?
5) Where is our strongest differentiation opportunity?
6) The 3 most actionable insights for our marketing and positioning

Cross-reference with our brand block [reference brand-block.md in Project Knowledge].
Workflow 2 — Client Sentiment & Language Mining

The language your clients use to describe their problems is the most powerful input you can give to any marketing copy. This workflow mines it systematically.

1

Collect raw client language

Sources: WhatsApp messages from clients asking questions, email threads with clients, Google/Justdial reviews, any forum posts (CA Club India, Reddit IndiaInvests) where your target clients discuss their CA-related problems. Copy-paste 20-30 examples into a text doc.

2

Run the pain language extraction prompt

The goal is to surface the exact phrases and words clients use — not what a CA thinks clients care about, but what clients themselves say.

3

Save output as pain-vocabulary.md in Project Knowledge

Every piece of marketing copy you write going forward should pull from this vocabulary. Ad headlines, LinkedIn posts, WhatsApp broadcasts — all of it.

Prompt 2 — Pain Language Extraction
Analyze the following real messages, reviews, and forum posts from CA firm clients and potential clients.

Extract:
1) The exact phrases and words people use to describe their problem (not paraphrased — actual language)
2) The emotions behind the language (fear / frustration / confusion / urgency)
3) The top 5 recurring pain points, ranked by frequency
4) What "success" looks like in their language — how do they describe what they want?
5) Questions they repeatedly ask (these are content ideas)
6) What they say about experiences with their current or past CA firm (positive and negative)

Format as a vocabulary reference document with direct quotes. These phrases should be used verbatim in our marketing copy.

[PASTE CLIENT MESSAGES / REVIEWS / FORUM POSTS HERE]
Workflow 3 — Regulatory & Industry Intelligence (The Highest-Leverage Research)

Every Budget, GST Council meeting, MCA circular, or SEBI notification is a research and content opportunity. This workflow turns any regulatory update into structured intelligence within 30 minutes.

1

Get the source document

Budget speech PDF, CBDT circular, GST notification, MCA amendment — any official document. Download it and paste the relevant sections (or the full text for shorter circulars) into Claude.

2

Run the regulatory intelligence prompt

This converts the official document into: a structured summary, impact analysis by client segment, and ready-to-use content angles — all in one run.

3

Use the output to feed the Content Department

The research output becomes the input for your content team. One regulatory event → one research brief → multiple content pieces across LinkedIn, WhatsApp, email.

Prompt 3 — Regulatory Update Intelligence Brief
You are a CA firm's research analyst. Analyze the following regulatory update/circular/budget amendment.

Produce a structured intelligence brief covering:

SUMMARY
- What changed in plain English (3-4 sentences, no jargon)
- Effective date

IMPACT BY CLIENT SEGMENT
- Impact on startups/early-stage companies
- Impact on established SMEs
- Impact on HNI individuals (if applicable)
- Impact on specific industries we serve: [list your focus industries]

URGENCY ASSESSMENT
- Who needs to take action immediately?
- What action do they need to take?
- What's the consequence of inaction?

OPPORTUNITIES
- Are there planning opportunities this creates?
- Are there services we should be proactively offering?

CONTENT ANGLES
- 3 LinkedIn post angles with suggested hooks
- 1 WhatsApp broadcast message (plain language, 3 sentences max)
- 1 client email subject line
- 1 FAQ this will generate from clients

[PASTE REGULATORY DOCUMENT / CIRCULAR / NOTIFICATION TEXT HERE]

This is the foundational workflow. Run it every time a significant notification drops. Being the first CA firm to publish a clear plain-English explainer is how you build authority.

Workflow 4 — Deep Research Mode (Claude Max)

For larger research projects — market sizing, sector analysis, competitor deep-dives — use Claude's Research mode. Toggle it in Claude.ai before sending your prompt. Standard mode runs 5-15 minutes. Advanced mode can run up to 45 minutes and checks hundreds of sources.

Prompt 4 — Deep Research: Sector Intelligence for CA Marketing
Deep research task: I am a CA firm in India targeting [specific segment — e.g., early-stage tech startups in Bangalore].

Research and produce a structured sector intelligence report covering:

1) Market size and growth: How many [segment] businesses exist in India / [city]? How fast is the segment growing?

2) Compliance complexity: What are the top regulatory challenges specific to [segment] in FY26? (funding-related FEMA compliance / ESOP taxation / GST for SaaS / transfer pricing)

3) Content gaps: What compliance/tax questions is this segment asking online but not finding good answers to? (Check Reddit IndiaInvests, Startup India community, CA Club India forums)

4) Content opportunity: What topics are no CA firms currently covering well for this segment?

5) Competitive landscape: Which CA firms or services are specifically marketing to this segment? What are they saying?

6) Marketing channels: Where does this segment spend time online? (Which communities, newsletters, LinkedIn groups, Slack groups?)

Format as an executive brief with a comparison table and 5 actionable insights.
Return all sources.
Skills to Use
/competitor-alternatives /marketing-ideas /marketing-psychology /content-strategy
Inputs Needed → Expected Output
What You Provide
  • Competitor firm names + their URLs
  • Raw client messages / reviews (20-30 samples)
  • Official regulatory documents (PDFs / text)
  • Your target segment description
  • The decision you're trying to make
What Claude Produces
  • Competitor positioning map with whitespace analysis
  • Pain vocabulary document (client's own words)
  • Regulatory intelligence brief with content angles
  • Sector report with content gap analysis
  • Weekly monitoring digest (if automated)

02

Content Department

Claude is the writer. The intern is the editor and publisher. Volume goes from 2 posts/week to 15+ pieces/week without adding headcount.

Replaces: Content writer + Social media manager + Newsletter writer
Step 0 — Train Claude on the Founder's Voice (Do Once)

The most important content setup. Without this, everything sounds like generic AI. With it, Claude writes in the founder's voice with 70%+ publishable output on the first draft.

1

Gather 5-10 voice samples

Collect: 3-5 emails the founder has written to clients, 2-3 WhatsApp explanations of complex topics, any LinkedIn posts if they exist, the founder's way of explaining a common CA concept verbally. Minimum 2,000 words total. Raw and unpolished is better than polished.

2

Run the voice analysis prompt

Paste all samples into Claude and run the analysis. This produces a style guide document.

3

Upload style guide to Project Knowledge

Save the output as voice-profile.md and upload to the Claude Project. Add a short refresh prompt (100-150 words of the key rules) to the Project's Custom Instructions so it's always active.

Voice Analysis Prompt
You are an expert writing coach. Analyze the following writing samples from a CA firm founder.

Identify the unique patterns that make their writing distinctive:
1) Sentence structure — average length, variation, use of short punchy sentences vs. longer explanation
2) Vocabulary — formality level, words they use that others don't, words they never use
3) How they open (emails, explanations, posts)
4) How they use numbers and data
5) How they explain complex concepts — analogies, examples, step-by-step?
6) Tone — formal or conversational? Direct or hedged?
7) 5-8 signature phrases or expressions they repeat
8) What they never say — jargon, corporate speak, anything that feels unnatural for them

Then produce:
A) A 600-word style guide with explicit DO and DON'T examples
B) A 100-word refresh prompt (for pasting at the start of future writing sessions)

[PASTE WRITING SAMPLES HERE]
Workflow 1 — Regulatory Moment → Multi-Format Content

When a Budget, GST update, or CBDT circular drops — this workflow produces 5 content pieces in under 20 minutes. Being first with clear content is a CA firm's biggest content advantage.

1

Run the Research brief first

Use Research Workflow 3 (regulatory intelligence brief) to extract the substance. This becomes the input for all content.

2

Run the multi-format content prompt

Paste the research brief into Claude with the prompt below. One run produces all formats simultaneously.

3

Intern reviews and publishes within 2 hours of the news

Founder does a 5-minute read-through to check facts and voice. Intern publishes LinkedIn, sends WhatsApp broadcast, schedules email.

Multi-Format Content Prompt
Using my brand voice profile and the research brief below, create the following content pieces:

1) LINKEDIN POST
Hook-driven post (max 1,300 characters). Open with one line that makes a CA's client stop scrolling. Explain what changed in plain English. 3 bullet points on who it affects and how. End with one question. No hashtag spam — 2-3 max.

2) LINKEDIN CAROUSEL (5 slides)
Slide 1: Hook headline
Slides 2-4: One key point per slide, plain language
Slide 5: CTA / what to do next
Give slide-by-slide copy only (text content, not design)

3) WHATSAPP BROADCAST (90 words max)
3 short paragraphs. Plain English. What changed, who it affects, one action to take. Sound like a message from a friend, not a corporate announcement.

4) EMAIL SUBJECT LINE
3 options: one curiosity-driven, one urgency-driven, one specific (with numbers/dates)

5) INSTAGRAM CAPTION (for a carousel or reel)
Punchy opening line. 3-4 lines of explanation. Simple CTA.

RESEARCH BRIEF: [paste from Research Workflow 3]
VOICE PROFILE: [reference voice-profile.md in Project Knowledge]
Workflow 2 — Content Repurposing Pipeline

One piece of original content → 8-10 platform-ready pieces. This is how you produce at volume with minimal effort.

Repurposing Prompt — Blog / Article → Multiple Formats
Read this article/post I've written. Using my brand voice profile, create:

1) LinkedIn post — under 1,300 characters, hook opening, 3 key takeaways, one CTA
2) Twitter/X thread — 6 tweets in a narrative arc. Each tweet standalone-readable.
3) Newsletter intro — 3-sentence teaser + subject line (give 3 subject line options)
4) WhatsApp broadcast — 80 words, plain English, one clear action
5) Instagram caption — punchy, personal, CTA at end
6) 5 LinkedIn post IDEAS (not written out) from different angles in this article

ARTICLE: [paste article]
VOICE: [reference voice-profile.md]
Angle Extractor — Before Writing a LinkedIn Post
I want to write a LinkedIn post about [topic]. Here are my rough thoughts:

[PASTE ROUGH NOTES / VOICE MEMO TRANSCRIPT]

Give me 3 different angles I could take on this topic for LinkedIn:
- Contrarian angle (challenges conventional wisdom)
- Specific angle (built around a number, case, or example)
- Personal angle (story from my practice)

For each angle, give me: the hook line (opening sentence), the core argument in 2 sentences, and whether it fits awareness / consideration / conversion intent.

Audience: [your ICP]
Voice: [reference voice-profile.md]
Skills to Use
/content-strategy /copywriting /copy-editing /social-content /humanizer
Inputs Needed → Expected Output
What You Provide
  • 5-10 writing samples for voice training
  • Regulatory document or topic brief
  • Rough notes / voice memo / bullet points
  • Brand voice file (one-time setup)
What Claude Produces
  • LinkedIn posts, carousels, threads
  • WhatsApp broadcast copy
  • Email subject lines + newsletter intro
  • Instagram captions
  • 10+ pieces from one input

03

Design Direction Department

Claude can't design. But it writes briefs so specific that the intern needs zero follow-up questions to execute in Canva.

Replaces: Creative director + Design briefer
Step 0 — Build Your Design Brand Block (Do Once)

Like the brand voice file, this is a one-time reference file that gets pasted at the start of every design brief prompt. Consistency comes from the inputs, not the AI.

Design Brand Block Template
BRAND DESIGN REFERENCE
Firm: [Name]

COLORS
Primary: [Hex code] — used for: [backgrounds / headlines]
Secondary: [Hex code] — used for: [accents / CTAs]
Neutral: [Hex code] — used for: [body text / borders]
White: #FFFFFF
Background: [Hex code]

TYPOGRAPHY
Heading font: [Font name] [weight e.g. Bold 700]
Body font: [Font name] [weight e.g. Regular 400]
Accent font: [if any]

VISUAL STYLE (describe in 8 adjectives)
e.g.: Clean, minimal, trustworthy, warm, professional, approachable, data-forward, high whitespace

DO NOT INCLUDE
[e.g. Neon colors, drop shadows, clip art, stock photo people shaking hands, red color for anything except alerts]

REFERENCE BRANDS (visual direction only)
[e.g. "Similar visual feel to Zerodha or ClearTax — clean fintech aesthetic"]

PLATFORM DIMENSIONS
Instagram: 1080x1080 (square), 1080x1350 (portrait)
LinkedIn: 1200x627 (landscape post), 1080x1080 (square)
WhatsApp: 800x800 minimum
Stories: 1080x1920
Workflow 1 — Content → Canva Brief

For every piece of content the Content Department produces, this workflow generates a matching design brief. The intern takes the brief directly into Canva — no interpretation needed.

Canva Brief Prompt — LinkedIn Carousel
You are a creative director writing a Canva execution brief for a designer.

BRAND REFERENCE: [paste design brand block above]

DELIVERABLE: LinkedIn carousel, [X] slides, 1080x1080

CONTENT TO DESIGN: [paste the carousel copy from Content Workflow]

Produce a slide-by-slide design brief. For each slide include:
- Slide purpose (cover / explanation / example / CTA)
- Text content (exact words — do not change)
- Layout direction (e.g., "text left, graphic element right" / "full bleed color block with centered text")
- Background color (use hex from brand block)
- Text color and hierarchy (which font for what text, approximate sizing)
- Visual element (icon / illustration direction / chart type / no visual)
- Mood for this slide (e.g., "urgent", "reassuring", "factual")

End with:
- Overall visual concept in 2 sentences (what should the full carousel FEEL like?)
- 3 things the designer must NOT do

No follow-up questions should be needed after this brief.
Canva Brief Prompt — Single Graphic (Announcement / Tip)
Write a Canva design brief for a single-image [Instagram / LinkedIn] post.

BRAND REFERENCE: [paste design brand block]

PLATFORM: [Instagram square 1080x1080 / LinkedIn landscape 1200x627]

CONTENT: [paste the copy — headline, subtext, CTA]

The brief must specify:
1) Background treatment (solid color / gradient / textured — with exact hex)
2) Text layout and hierarchy (headline size vs. body size, position on canvas)
3) Visual element (if any — describe style: flat icon, minimal illustration, data visualization, none)
4) Color usage map (which hex goes where)
5) Whitespace usage (generous / tight — and where)
6) One visual "anchor" — the element the eye goes to first
7) What to avoid (specific to this piece)

Brand: [paste design block]
Content: [paste copy]
Workflow 2 — Campaign Visual Direction (Before Any Design Starts)

Before a major content push or campaign, use this to establish visual direction. Get alignment on the look and feel before executing 10 pieces in the wrong direction.

Visual Territory Prompt
Create 3 different visual direction territories for our [ITR season campaign / client acquisition campaign / [topic] campaign].

For each territory:
- Territory name (2-3 words)
- Color palette (3-4 hex codes with brief rationale for each)
- Typography direction (what personality the fonts should convey — e.g., authoritative, approachable, minimal)
- Photography/illustration direction (real documentary-style photos / clean flat illustration / icon-forward / data visualization / no photos — text only)
- One reference brand that uses this visual territory (for the intern to look up)
- Why this territory would OR would not fit our CA firm audience

After presenting 3, recommend which one to use and why.

Our brand reference: [paste design brand block]
Campaign context: [1-2 sentences about the campaign]
Audience: [ICP]
Skills to Use
/canvas-design /ad-creative
Inputs Needed → Expected Output
What You Provide
  • Brand colors (hex codes)
  • Font names and weights
  • Style adjectives + negative cues
  • Content copy (from Content Dept.)
  • Platform and dimensions
What Claude Produces
  • Slide-by-slide Canva brief
  • Color usage map per asset
  • Typography hierarchy instructions
  • Visual element direction
  • Campaign mood board territories

04

Long-Form Thought Leadership

20 minutes of the founder's time converts into a whitepaper, a downloadable guide, or a 1,500-word LinkedIn article. Assets that generate inbound for months.

Replaces: Ghostwriter + Content strategist
The rule: AI structures and drafts. The founder provides raw truth — an opinion, a story, a real client example, a data point. The AI cannot invent these. Every long-form piece must contain at least one thing only the founder could know.
Workflow 1 — Voice Note → Published Article

The founder records a 15-20 minute voice memo on any topic they know well. Claude turns it into a structured, publishable article. Time investment from the founder: 20 minutes recording + 10 minutes reviewing.

1

Record the voice note with structure prompts

The founder records while walking or commuting. Use these prompts to yourself before recording: "Who is this for? What's the problem? What do most people get wrong about this? What do I do differently? What's one specific example from my practice? What should someone do after reading this?"

2

Transcribe (don't clean up)

Use phone's native voice memo transcription, or paste audio into an AI transcription tool. Do not edit the transcript — raw is better. The founder's natural speech patterns carry the voice.

3

Run the extraction prompt first

Before drafting, extract the key claims and examples from the transcript. This prevents the AI from adding filler to reach word count.

4

Draft section by section

Never one-shot a full article. Draft the intro first, review it, then continue to the body sections. This preserves quality and voice throughout.

Prompt Step 1 — Extraction Before Drafting
Read this voice memo transcript from a CA firm founder.

Extract only what's actually in the transcript — do not add anything:
1) The 3 most distinct/defensible claims they make
2) Every specific example, story, or case mentioned (with any details given)
3) Every data point or number mentioned
4) The founder's core belief about [topic]
5) What questions remain unanswered in the transcript (gaps we should address)
6) The most quotable/sharp sentence (can be used verbatim as a LinkedIn hook)

Format as bullets. Use the founder's direct words where possible.

TRANSCRIPT: [paste transcript]
Prompt Step 2 — Section-by-Section Draft
Using the extraction above and my voice profile, write this article section by section.

Structure:
- Opening (100 words): One specific story or scenario that puts the reader immediately in the problem
- The wrong conventional wisdom (150 words): What most people / most CA firms believe vs. what's actually true
- The real insight (200 words): The founder's core claim with reasoning
- Evidence and examples (300 words): Use ONLY the examples from the extraction — do not invent
- What to do differently (200 words): Specific, actionable, opinionated
- One-line closing takeaway

Total: approx 950-1,000 words

Rules:
- No sentence that could have been written by anyone — every paragraph should sound like it came from a specific person with specific experience
- No hedging ("it may be," "it could be") — take a position
- Flag in [BRACKETS] any place where the founder should add a specific number, name, or example

Voice profile: [reference voice-profile.md]
Extraction: [paste from Step 1 above]
Prompt Step 3 — EEAT Audit (After Drafting)
Read this draft article. Flag:
1) Every sentence that sounds like it was written by generic AI (no specific detail, no clear opinion)
2) Every claim that lacks a specific source, example, or number to back it
3) Every place where the author avoids taking a clear position
4) Any of these AI phrases to replace: "delve into", "in today's world", "it's worth noting", "leverage", "multifaceted", "in conclusion"

Return a numbered list of issues only. Do not rewrite — just flag.

Run this before finalizing any long-form piece. Fix every item it flags before publishing.

Workflow 2 — Annual Whitepaper / Downloadable Guide

One flagship long-form asset per quarter. Examples for a CA firm: "Tax Planning Guide for Indian Startups FY26", "The GST Audit Readiness Checklist", "What Every D2C Founder Should Know About Compliance in Year 1." These generate inbound leads for months.

Whitepaper Framework Prompt
I am producing a whitepaper for our CA firm. Title: "[TITLE]"
Target audience: [ICP]
Goal: [e.g., Generate leads from startup founders / Position us as the go-to CA for D2C brands]

My research and notes: [paste research brief from Research Dept + any founder knowledge]

PHASE 1 — Build the argument framework ONLY (do not draft yet):
- Primary claim (the one thing this whitepaper proves)
- 3-4 sub-claims that support it, in logical sequence
- What a skeptical reader would push back on for each claim
- What evidence standard each section needs (data / case study / expert opinion / logical argument)
- The "so what" — what should the reader be able to do after reading this?

PHASE 2 — (after I approve the framework) Draft the structure:
- Executive summary (5 bullets, outcomes-focused)
- Introduction: the problem with stakes
- Section 1-4: each sub-claim with evidence
- Recommendations: specific, opinionated, actionable
- Conclusion + CTA

Voice profile: [reference voice-profile.md]

Start with Phase 1 only. Wait for my approval before drafting.
Skills to Use
/copywriting /humanizer /copy-editing /content-strategy
Inputs Needed → Expected Output
What Founder Provides
  • 15-20 min voice note (or 30 bullet points)
  • One real client example (anonymized ok)
  • One clear opinion or contrarian stance
  • Approval at framework stage
  • 10-min final review pass
What Claude Produces
  • Structured 900-1,200 word article
  • Whitepaper framework + full draft
  • Downloadable guide copy
  • E-E-A-T audit with fix list
  • Repurposed content from each piece

05

Campaign Architecture Department

When you want to launch something — a new service, ITR season push, referral program — Claude builds the full campaign document. The intern executes against it.

Replaces: Campaign manager + Media planner + Strategist
Step 0 — Context Loading (Do Once Per Campaign)

Before any campaign prompt, load Claude's context with what it needs. This is the "brain" for the campaign. Run this as the first message in any new campaign chat.

Campaign Context Block
You are working as a senior marketing strategist for [FIRM NAME], a CA consultancy.

From Project Knowledge: [reference brand-block.md]

CAMPAIGN-SPECIFIC CONTEXT:
Campaign type: [LAUNCH / SEASONAL / LEAD-GEN / REFERRAL / AWARENESS]
Objective: [One sentence — e.g., "Generate 20 qualified discovery calls in 30 days"]
Timeline: [Start date → End date]
Budget: [Total / per channel if known — or "no paid budget, organic only"]
Channels available: [LinkedIn / WhatsApp / Email / Instagram / Referral / Events]

AUDIENCE FOR THIS CAMPAIGN:
[Be specific — not "SME owners" but "Startup founders who recently raised their first round and need compliance setup"]

OFFER / ANGLE:
[What are we offering? e.g., "Free 30-min compliance audit call" / "Advance tax planning consultation" / "GST notice response support"]

PAST PERFORMANCE (if any):
[Any open rates, conversion rates, response rates from past campaigns]

For every output in this session, maintain this context.
Workflow 1 — Full Campaign Brief (GACCS Framework)

One prompt produces the complete campaign document. Use it as the brief you hand to the intern for execution.

Campaign Brief Prompt
Based on the context above, write a full campaign brief using the GACCS framework:

G — GOALS
Primary objective (one sentence)
3 supporting KPIs with: what we're measuring, baseline (if known), and target
What success looks like at Day 14 and Day 30

A — AUDIENCE
Primary segment (role, company type, stage, specific pain for this campaign)
How they currently find CA firms
What they care about most right now (seasonal urgency if applicable)

C — CREATIVE
Core narrative: one sentence that ties the campaign together
Messaging hierarchy: primary claim → 3 supporting proof points → one-liner for direct outreach
Tone for this campaign (may differ from default brand tone)
What we never say in this campaign

C — CHANNELS
Channel mix with role for each (awareness / consideration / conversion)
Sequencing: what fires first, what follows, at what intervals
Cadence per channel
4-week calendar (what goes out when)

S — STRUCTURE
Asset list (what content needs to be produced)
Who owns what (founder / intern)
Review checkpoints

End with a one-paragraph answer to: "Why will this campaign work?"
Workflow 2 — Messaging Hierarchy + Copy Variants

After the brief, build the message matrix. This document becomes the source of truth for every piece of copy the intern produces — so all assets feel coherent across channels.

Messaging Hierarchy Prompt
Using the campaign brief above, build a messaging hierarchy:

1) PRIMARY MESSAGE: One sentence that works across all channels
2) PROOF POINTS: 3 supporting statements (each addressing one buyer objection or fear)
3) PERSONA VARIANTS:
   - Rewrite the primary message for [Persona A — e.g., startup founder] (emphasize [compliance peace of mind])
   - Rewrite for [Persona B — e.g., established SME owner] (emphasize [tax savings])

4) COPY BY LENGTH:
   - 6-8 words: for LinkedIn headline / banner
   - 15-20 words: for email subject / WhatsApp opening
   - 50 words: for ad body / LinkedIn hook
   - 150 words: for email body / LinkedIn post

5) CTA VARIANTS:
   - Low commitment: [e.g., "Download the guide"]
   - Medium commitment: [e.g., "Book a free 20-min call"]
   - High commitment: [e.g., "Start your compliance review today"]

6) WHAT NOT TO SAY: 3 phrases to avoid and why
Copy Variants Prompt (A/B/C Testing)
Generate copy variants for this campaign. For each asset, give 3 versions testing different angles:

EMAIL SUBJECT LINES (9 total):
- 3 testing curiosity angle
- 3 testing urgency angle (seasonal / deadline-driven)
- 3 testing social proof / authority

LINKEDIN OPENING HOOKS (6 total):
- 3 for startup founders
- 3 for SME owners

WHATSAPP OPENING LINES (3 total):
- 1 story-driven
- 1 question-driven
- 1 data/number-driven

For each variant, note the psychological trigger: curiosity / urgency / authority / loss aversion / social proof.

Voice: [reference voice-profile.md]
Campaign context: [reference campaign brief above]
Skills to Use
/paid-ads /launch-strategy /marketing-psychology /email-sequence /analytics-tracking /referral-program
Workflow 3 — Measurement Framework + Iteration Loop

The campaign doesn't end at launch. Feed real performance data back in weekly and Claude tells you what to change.

Measurement Framework Prompt
Build a measurement framework for this campaign:

1) North Star metric: the ONE number that determines if this campaign worked
2) Leading indicators: 3-4 metrics to check weekly that signal early success or failure
3) Channel KPIs: one primary metric per channel (LinkedIn: [what], Email: [what], WhatsApp: [what])
4) Weekly review checklist: what to look at, what thresholds trigger a pivot
5) What "good" looks like at Day 7 / Day 14 / Day 30
6) Failure conditions: which metrics tell us to stop or change approach
Weekly Optimization Prompt (Run Every Monday)
Here are the results from the past week of the campaign:

LinkedIn: [impressions / reach / engagement rate / clicks]
Email: [open rate / click rate / replies]
WhatsApp: [delivery rate / response rate]
Conversions: [calls booked / leads captured]
Any qualitative feedback: [paste any replies or responses you received]

Based on this:
1) What is working better than expected?
2) What is underperforming? What's the most likely reason?
3) Which copy angle (A/B/C) is winning?
4) What 2-3 specific changes should we make this week?
5) What hypothesis should we test next week?
Inputs Needed → Expected Output
What You Provide
  • Campaign objective (one sentence)
  • Audience description (specific)
  • Offer or angle
  • Budget and channels available
  • Weekly performance data
What Claude Produces
  • Full GACCS campaign brief
  • Messaging hierarchy with copy sizes
  • A/B/C copy variants per asset
  • 4-week execution calendar
  • Weekly optimization recommendations

W1

Week 1 Implementation Plan

Everything you need to get the first real output from each department in 7 days.

Day 1–2 — Foundation Setup
  • Create Claude Project named "[Firm Name] Marketing" on Claude.ai
  • Fill out Brand Block using the template from Section 0 — upload as brand-block.md to Project Knowledge
  • Fill out Design Brand Block — save as design-brand.md and upload
  • Gather 5-10 voice samples from the founder — emails, WhatsApp messages, any writing
  • Run Voice Analysis Prompt — upload output as voice-profile.md to Project Knowledge
  • Build the refresh prompt (100 words) — paste into Project Custom Instructions
Day 3 — First Research Run
  • Pick 3 competitor CA firms — gather their homepage copy + 10 reviews each
  • Run per-competitor analysis prompt for each (Research Workflow 1A)
  • Run cross-competitor synthesis prompt (Research Workflow 1B)
  • Save the positioning whitespace finding — this informs all content going forward
  • Collect 20 client messages/reviews and run Pain Language Extraction (Research Workflow 2)
  • Save output as pain-vocabulary.md — upload to Project Knowledge
Day 4–5 — First Content Output
  • Pick one regulatory update or CA topic the founder knows deeply
  • Run Regulatory Intelligence Brief (Research Workflow 3)
  • Run Multi-Format Content Prompt (Content Workflow 1) — produces LinkedIn post, carousel, WhatsApp, email
  • Founder reviews and approves (should take under 10 minutes)
  • Run Design Brief Prompt for the carousel (Design Workflow 1)
  • Intern executes carousel in Canva against the brief
  • Publish LinkedIn post + send WhatsApp broadcast
Day 6–7 — First Long-Form + Campaign Brief
  • Founder records 20-minute voice note on one CA topic they're most expert in
  • Transcribe voice note using phone or any free tool
  • Run Extraction Prompt (Long-Form Workflow 1, Step 1)
  • Run Draft Prompt section by section (Long-Form Workflow 1, Step 2)
  • Run EEAT Audit Prompt and fix flagged issues
  • Pick one upcoming campaign (ITR season / new service / referral push)
  • Run Campaign Context Block + GACCS Brief Prompt
  • Review and save campaign brief — this is the execution plan for the next 30 days
After Week 1 — What the System Looks Like
Department What's Active Weekly Time (Intern) Weekly Time (Founder)
Research Competitor map + pain vocabulary in Project Knowledge. Run per new regulation or quarterly. 1-2 hrs (new research runs) 20 min (review findings)
Content Brand voice active in Project. Regulatory → multi-format pipeline running. 3-4 hrs (prompts + editing + publishing) 30 min (voice notes + approvals)
Design Design brief template ready. Canva brand kit set up. 2-3 hrs (brief → Canva execution) 10 min (visual approvals)
Long-Form Voice profile active. One article or guide per 2 weeks. 2 hrs (prompts + enrichment pass) 30 min (voice note + final review)
Campaign One active campaign brief. Weekly optimization loop running. 1 hr (execution + data pull) 20 min (weekly performance review)
Total ~10-12 hrs/week ~2 hrs/week

Built with Claude Max · All prompts are copy-paste ready · Start with Research on Day 1